Your Highness: Why Weren't Thou Funny?
Sunday, April 10, 2011 at 6:28AM
Click to enlargeAll of the previews for Your Highness looked so promising. Normally with a comedy that turns out this flat and unfunny, the previews give you fair warning you're about to waste a good $10 on a movie ticket. You'll normally get the same preview over and over, because there just isn't enough material to work with. In the case of Your Highness, there were several different previews, each one very funny.
On top of it, you can typically be forewarned of a lame comedy by the running time. Usually a throwaway movie is barely making it to ninety minutes (including credits). Your Highness has a running time of 1:42. Promising!
Reality can crush the soul. The clever editing for the previews was not there in the movie. I suspect much of it ended up on the cutting room floor, yet still would have done little to save this bland tale of adventure laced with penis jokes, weak attempts at humor about molestation, and desperate uses of the F-bomb to make us laugh. Because anytime you hear "fuck" in a genteel British accent, it's funny, right?
Danny McBride (Pineapple Express ) is credited as one of the main writers. If this is his idea of funny, he needs to go back and sit down at the feet of masters. He needs to watch Monty Python's Quest For The Holy Grail, Mel Brook's History Of The World Part I and Robin Hood: Men In Tights, read Shakespeare, and listen to anything George Carlin. You can tell he was going for anachronistic humor, and the shock value of vulgar humor in a normally polite backdrop. He forgot that humor still needs a framework to be hung from. In a movie format it needs a good storyline and characters we can connect with. Otherwise we just have people saying "fuck" without any context to make it actually funny.
Just like drama needs to break up the pace with some humor to give the audience a chance to breathe, comedy needs to respect it's counterpart. Every time we got close to understanding these characters better, connecting with them on a personal level by learning about their understandably tragic pasts, the script suddenly shies away and goes for a crude remark. There were scenes with Natalie Portman's character, Isabel, where she explains how she became a vengeful (and kickass) knight, but the chance to get to know her is yanked away by the writer's obvious terror of any serious moment somehow making this less of a comedy.
The acting is superb, which makes this all the more painful of a disappointment. James Franco, Natalie Portman, Zooey Daschenal, even Danny McBride, all give wonderful performances with the steaming pile of boring they were given. The special effects are very cool, and part of what made me want to see this on the big screen. The lush landscapes are gorgeous, giving it that epic feel. Everything is in place to make this an instant classic. It's the writing that kills this.
There are too many story lines going on at once, but that I can forgive. Many movies do that, but still at least let you get to know the characters so you feel sympathetic to their plight. Even the promising, but less than it could have been Krod Mandoon And The Flaming Sword Of Fire series understood this. The lead character was likable, and even though the humor was often vulgar, it was well placed, and not the crux of the whole venture. Your Highness' Thadeous, played by Danny McBride, is very difficult to like at the outset. I suspect mostly due to editing towards the end, you don't see this character develop into anyone you wouldn't enjoy seeing hung by dwarves, which makes the ending even harder to swallow.
Overall, this was more soul-crushingly disappointing than anything else. The movie didn't suck. It didn't blow. It just sort of laid there and thought of England.
The Queen Herself | Comments Off | 




